Friday, October 14, 2011

Your character determines your credibility and integrity : guard it with everything you have got.



I used to be in banking once upon a time.  With a team of seven people, I helped set up what used to be called the Zimbabwe Banking Corporation (ZIMBANK) Small Business Services Division (SBSD).  The late eighties to early nineties was one of the most illuminating periods of my life. I learnt about people, honor and entrepreneurship in a way that has stayed with me up to this day.

For many countries through out the world, the promotion of small and medium sized businesses (SME’S) is a cornerstone of economic policy. Government support for small enterprise appears to be based on the widely held perception that the SME sector is an incubator of economic growth, a place where innovation takes place and new ideas become economically viable business enterprises. In addition, policymakers routinely point to SMEs as important sources of employment growth. It is not surprising, then, that there was widespread political support for government programs and other subsidies aimed at encouraging the growth and development of SMEs in Zimbabwe during the late 1980’s and throughout the nineties.

A particular area of concern for Zimbabwe policymakers was whether small businesses where accessing enough credit and if there was credit extended to them at all, to fund their business operations. After all, many SMEs at inception have little or no credit history, no collateral and questionable capability as many aspire to venture into areas they have no experience in. Lenders have ordinarily been known to be reluctant to fund SMEs with new and innovative products because of the difficulty associated with evaluating the risk of such products. These difficulties are classic information problems; obtaining sufficient information about the parties involved in a transaction; and they may prevent otherwise creditworthy companies from obtaining credit. If information problems are substantial, they can lead to declining of loans or credit rationing. Credit rationing is when loans are allocated by some mechanism other than price. To the extent that credit rationing significantly affects SMEs credit markets, a rationale exists for supporting SMEs through government programs aimed at improving SME access to credit.

During that the late 80’s and early 90’s, the government of Zimbabwe (GOZ) introduced many enabling initiatives, the most generous of which where located within the former Credit Guarantee Company (CGC), which was a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. Millions of Zimbabwe dollars (long before hyperinflation and the Zimbabwe dollar was still regarded decent and tradable currency) where placed within the CGC to act as a guarantee for all loan advances to SMEs through the five commercial banks. This was before the financial services industry was deregulated to allow new entrants into the market place and therefore there were just five banks, ZIMBANK, Standard Chartered, Barclays, Commercial Bank of Zimbabwe and Standard Bank of South Africa (STANBIC).

As these banks (referred to then as “traditional” banks because of their being averse to lending to the SME sector) jumped onto the bandwagon of setting up small business divisions as a result of the increased guarantee scheme within CGC, the entrepreneurial market responded accordingly. Many people set up businesses and accessed financing from the different banks.

As bankers targeting SMEs at ZIMBANK SBSD, one of the criteria, albeit very traditional that we used in appraising business proposals from the SME sector were the three C’s, Collateral, Capability and Character.

Collateral is the security, preferably immovable, which if available, for example, the Bank would secure the title deed and register a first or second mortgage on the property as security. We became creative and if the business loan was going to be used to buy equipment for the business, the Bank would have a lien over that property. This is a rather simplistic example but forms the essence of what collateral we secured from the SMEs.

Capacity involved assessing for managerial capacity to run the business, including analyzing the skill sets the project promoter and their employees had in the business to be funded. For example, if a lawyer wanted to set up a construction business and they were going to do the work themselves, we would obviously be worried and probe the applicant further. The complexion of the application would change if for example, the lawyer project promoter had a foreman and brick layers, carpenters, engineers, roof technicians and so on who were qualified to execute all the construction projects.

Character entailed investigating the level of indebtedness of the person with other people, organizations and financial institutions. We also tracked down people who had transacted with the person and asked them to provide objective opinions. The personal interview also provided a lot of clues about the nature of the project promoter. During the interviewing process, I personally worried, about people who did not answer the questions asked, body language and reading in between the lines. This is all very subjective stuff but I believe that when one acquires experience over time on interviewing potential borrowers, one hones their skills on hearing clearly what the other person is not saying during that communication process.

For example, we realized that many men who wanted to access these interest low and guaranteed loans had bad credit ratings. They then submitted their project proposals in the names of their wives, sisters or girlfriends, who were acting as fronts for them. During the interviewing process, we quickly picked up from discussing the essence of the business that the wife, sister or girlfriend was being set up as a front. When we probed enough, they owned up as it became increasingly apparent that it was not their business idea to start with. It is very difficult to be passionate about business when you are not business minded or to be passionate about a business idea, which you did not generate. The entrepreneurial zeal was therefore a key factor in our determination of the character of the entrepreneur.

Personally for me character assessment was the most exciting part of the project appraisal process. I remember recommending to the Advances Committee borderline SMEs whose project promoter characters were sincere and abundant with integrity. There are many who came with viable projects but whose characters were shady whom I did not give favorable recommendations.

I observed that, at about ninety five percent of the time, I was right in giving Character, the largest weight amongst the three Cs, because I saw many borderline SMEs whose promoters were genuine, grow from strength to strength and obviously viable SME projects whose promoters lacked credibility struggle or fail completely.

What many people do not realize is that your character is your passport to opportunity as it determines your credibility and integrity. It impacts on everything you do at home, socially and particularly in business. It is impossible for a person to have a different personality for the home, with friends and at work. If that is the case and you are a potential lender to this person, be very very worried. Consistency is a key ingredient in good character development. When you are not consistent, it is my considered opinion that you must be doubted.

Character is everything. As an experienced lender, you ignore your intuition at your own peril. That is the fundamental reason why after everything is said and done, people prefer to transact with either people they know or who have been recommended by people they know. Why? Because the person who is being referred or who is already known to you or others has had their character qualified or validated by one means or another. Just because you hold an MBA or a Doctorate in your field of expertise does not necessarily qualify you to have the right of passage to participate in certain transactions.

It is said that a lot of business deals are generated, discussed, apportioned and concluded on the golf course. Why? Golf players spend a lot of time together, walking the course, talking and of course playing the game. An 18 hole course, I understand might take some five or so hours to play. If say two teams of two people each play just twice a week, that is forty hours of sharing and of course bonding which is necessary in business. Escalate that to twice a week for say forty weeks per year, that amounts to some one thousand and six hundred hours of talk and bonding time. Perhaps that is why golf mates first seek each other out when opportunities present themselves than accommodate someone from “outside”. This is because, when you spend one hundred and sixty hours per month of playing, walking, talking, bonding, laughing and so on, you are bound to know each other fairly well. If you change your playing partners every month, it means you are expanding your territory of networks, people who can vouch for you.  After everything is said and done, it is the intangibles that matter and character determination is an intangible.

In order to successfully defend your character for prosperity, here are three concise suggestions to nibble on:

1.     Meet your financial obligations when they become due: If you cannot pay your debts or bills on time, do not bury your head in the sand like an ostrich hoping your incapacity to pay on time is going to go away. It will not. Contact the lender first before they contact you and renegotiate the terms of payment.  Be honest by advising them that you are experiencing a temporary cash flow situation. Do not lie by telling them long stories that you are waiting to be paid from the liquidation of your shares or something like, you are waiting to transfer money from your offshore account. Lenders are patient. They will document what you have said and wait for another excuse until, you have eroded your integrity and widened the credibility gap with them. The truth is the only way out. It is easier to remember the truth, than to remember a lie. Those who are now financially secure know all too well the challenges of cash flow when a business is still in its infancy and struggling to pay its bills. When you keep quiet, the lenders’ mind starts to become fertile with imagination; has the borrower run away? are they dead?, does the borrower have no intention of paying back?, and so on, etc.

2.     Live within your means: Whether you are in business or not, you need to postpone consumption, be frugal, save and live within your means. This is easier said than done. If you are unable to do it now, make it an aspirational goal. The media is one avenue solely responsible for people living beyond their means by encouraging conspicuous consumption and the “I want it, I must have it right now” mentality.  Someone once said, “it is a crazy world out there, when we buy what we do not need, with money we do not have, to impress the people that do not care about us and then spend the rest of our lives regretting it.” When you tarnish your financial credit worthiness, it becomes very difficult for you to transact in a highly networked society. We are living in the information age where people underestimate the movement of information from one place to another and the sharing taking place amongst people.

Our families’ trust recently walked away from a potentially viable business transaction we wanted to invest in because of the character of one of the business owners.  She borrowed money from a mutual friend and under the veil of moral superiority and all kinds of misrepresentations, is now delaying paying that debt back. This is totally unacceptable. Refrain from masquerading, tell the truth, explain your circumstances, whilst living within your means and ask for more time to regularize your financial matters with the lender. It pays to be truthful.

3.     Embark on any journey, business or otherwise for the long haul: Short-termism a term I use to describe those people who like short-term results, short-term businesses, short-term relationships and so on has led many a people down the narrow road towards despair and desperation. Getting into business, stay in business and making a success of it is no easy fit. Sometimes one needs nerves of steel, a sense of humor to laugh at ones’ self, sheer grit, tenacity, perseverance, commitment, timing, working both hard and smart, sometimes luck and sometimes knowing somebody who knows somebody who knows where to get something that you want. You must be hungry enough to want it so badly but remaining mindful of the fact that the rewards do not come overnight. You have to be in it for the long haul. That means not quitting when it becomes tough and unbearable, hanging in there when its easier to walk away, staying the course when perhaps all you see is a hazy ray of light far away into the pitch black unknown space. If you do not have these character-istics, then you are not suited for entrepreneurship and you are better off staying away from it as far away as possible. Never listen to anyone who tells you that they made money in their first year or two years of operations. It is not a business they are running, but a quick buck dealer-ship and during that year, they have participated in several deals.

I am now calling years 2000 -2010 in Zimbabwe the lost decade. Cultural values, business ethics and most importantly personal governance of the self have been diminished and minimized. Every nation in the world has got its barbarians waiting at the gate that it never allows to let in because they are deviants. During our lost decade, the barbarians were erroneously allowed in and they have taken over and redefined the character-istic of the Zimbabwe value system landscape we all used to be proud of. Choose not to subscribe to the ethos of the barbarians in your courtyard. Reclaim your space. Take back your power and fight hard to redefine your character so that it stands for trust, honor, credibility and integrity by following these three above-mentioned suggestions and watch the positive changes in your life.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Because they can, rightly or wrongly.


I have been back home in Zimbabwe exactly two years in July 2011.  My observation that things are seldom what they appear to be, seems to aptly describe the general state of affairs in my beloved country. Whilst it is my considered opinion that, Zimbabwe is a country abundant with opportunities and alive with possibilities, I often wonder whether we are interrogating the right questions, whose answers would assist us in making informed decisions.

Have we ever wondered why a small landlocked country like Zimbabwe is forever courting international attention? Is courting international attention a strategic posture of the political establishment in this country. Coming from the private sector, it seems to me that political risk is the largest single factor impacting on business decision-making? What is the minimization of this political risk? Is the political risk controllable? Can political risk in Zimbabwe be managed? How can we incorporate political risk into our macro and micro scenario planning for business decision making at organizational and sector level?

Last week after the announcement that Gadhafi had fallen, many Libyan Embassies around the world apparently pulled down Gaddafi’s green flag and his portraits and replaced them with the flag of the National Transitional Council (NTC) of Libya.  After the foreign Embassies had announced to their host countries that they had defected to the NTC, all countries with the exception of Zimbabwe accomodated the move. Zimbabwe on the other hand, announced that the NTC is not accredited with the Government of Zimbabwe, a SADC and AU requirement and therefore would not recognize the Embassy’s new status.  In addition, if the Libyan Embassy in Zimbabwe no longer represented the interests of the Libyan people, they would be asked leave. Why does the political establishment in Zimbabwe continue in a contrarian behavior? Because it can.

There are many unsubstantiated reports in the Sunday media of today, the 28th August, 2011 suggesting that Gaddafi could have sought political asylum in Zimbabwe, a report ZANU PF has denied as speculative and untrue.  Assuming there is a shred of truth in these allegations, why would Zimbabwe go out of its way to harbor a perceived fugitive from justice whom the international community including the NTC of Libya has vowed would not let any clock, calendar nor boundary bar them from bringing him back to justice? Why would the political establishment in Zimbabwe even consider this move? Because it can and most probably no one and no body would stand in its way.

The events of the past ten to fifteen years around agrarian reform need no mention here in greater detail. Many white farmers in Zimbabwe have fought for nearly a decade, seeking compensation for their loss of immovable and movable assets which were seized from them violently. Not much progress has been made in this regard as some of the beneficiaries of the land reform programme are themselves part of the judiciary meant to preside over these cases. The drama that unfolded during this land reform programme happened in full view of the world and no interference from the international community, why? Because the political establishment, which is in essence the Government of Zimbabwe can.

More than thirty years on, Zimbabwe is taking about an indigenization policy that seeks to control and even nationalize foreign owned companies. First it was the land reform programme, and now it is the black economic and empowerment plan. What is evident is that there has been no extensive research and broad-based stakeholder consultations at sector level. Those who have been asked to spear head this policy have been hand picked because of their political affiliations to the current political establishment: a move not necessarily unusual when compared to other economic empowerment programmes in the region and world wide.  There are divisions in Zanu-PF, government and bureaucracy in general, ministers across the political divide and in state institutions, yet the Youth Development, Indigenization and Empowerment Minister is plodding along seemingly making up controversial rules and decisions as he goes along. Obviously, this is being sanctioned at a much more senior political level, because they can.

Recent and past events I have mentioned in this note are far from exhaustive. Be that as it may, having been an organizational strategist for most of my professional life, I am becoming increasingly uncomfortable about what I do not know about the political dynamics in Zimbabwe. Hence the maxim: things are seldom what they appear to be. The political landscape is fairly fluid and whilst appearing to be on less firm ground, the political power of Zanu-PF which sees itself and acts in a manner exuding seniority in the Global Political Agreement is undoubtedly the only certainty on the ground. There are too many unknowns and therefore many blind spots. When there are too many unknowns, it is becomes an exercise in futility to connect existing dots. When known dots remain unconnected, it implies serious chaos and fragmentation inside Zimbabwe Incorporated, which then stifles innovative thinking and hampers logical decision making.

This leads me to the conclusion that, what we might not know about our country is probably very shocking. Yes, we know that in the 21st century, change is the only constant.  However, if we are unable to plan for our future with a certain degree of certainty, then we are doomed into planning for the for-seeable short-term, which is what the majority in Zimbabwe have already become, in essence, living and planning for now, essentially compromising any meaningful future economic recovery of this beautiful nation. Unfortunately, time is not on our side and the rest of the world is not waiting for us to get our ducks in a row.


Tuesday, March 1, 2011

The National Employment Councils (NECs) in Zimbabwe: Are They Killing the Goose?

The National Employment Councils (NECs) in Zimbabwe: Are They Killing the Goose?

Written and Presented by Gloria R. Ndoro-Mkombachoto at the HUMAN RESOURCES (Pvt) Ltd Labour Relations Conference held at the Jacaranda Room, Rainbow Towers, on the 24th February, 2011

Good day ladies and gentlemen. All protocols observed.
Just under a year ago in May 2010, Zimbabwe was still in a major economic crisis with unemployment hovering at around 94% and our industries working at less than 40% of capacity. Fast forward to February 2011, the situation has not changed much; Zimbabwe is in a state of slow and painful change characterized by structural transformation. With very little to jump-start the economy, Zimbabwe must revitalize and grow this economy. The template upon which Zimbabwe must chart its economic path in the short, medium-to-long term is characterized by the following factors:
o   Erosion of competitiveness which has long been undermined by two decades of above average inflation culminating in unprecedented hyperinflation during the period 2005-2009.
o   Destruction of the national savings base
o   Liquidity and budgetary constraints and,
o   Eradication of the middle-class as a result of rampant unemployment
The dollarization of the economy has brought about great hope, tangible opportunities but also “blood, sweat and tears.” Our human resources are going to play a pivotal role in the transformation of our economy, but first, we now have to live within our means. This meansthat wage negotiations cannot be based on “economic hardships being felt at the time” but on the productivity of thelabour force. We cannot simply increase wages willynilly, say by 12% or more when our GDP is growing at under 4%. Before we talk about the growth of the economy, we must first plug in the leakages, unchain ourselves from the shackles of the past ten or so years, develop a master plan to turn the economy around at firm and sector level and then grow the economy.
The National Employment Councils (NECs) are at the centre of this economic transformation.  The parties to NEC must all be in belt tightening mode if the transformation of the Zimbabwean economy is going to be achieved hence it is unfortunate that we now have the unfortunate set of circumstances we are currently witnessing, circumstances likely to derail turnaround of Zimbabwe Incorporated.
Government, Labour, Employers and Employees in all the sectors of our economy are all tied at the hip. Zimbabwe cannot afford right now to have any one of these stakeholders, (in particular labour and those that purport to speak for and represent labour) pulling away at cross purposes in another direction.


The Legal Framework
International Labour Standards[i]
Zimbabwe is a signatory to International Conventions administered by the ILO.Inaddition, it also has an obligation to uphold the principles enshrined in the 1998Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, which encourages ILOmember states to respect the eight core Conventions, with or without ratification. ILOConventions place an obligation on the government to respect, fulfil and refrain fromviolating the socio-economic rights of men and women in respect of decent and fairworking conditions. The Conventions set minimum standards of application andgovernments are expected to report on the progress of their implementation.Under Zimbabwean law, ILO Conventions do not automatically become part of thenational law; for this to occur they have to be domesticated through an Act ofParliament.However, these Conventions have had a significant influence on the national
labour legislation in Zimbabwe.

Statutory Law

Firstly, the Constitution of Zimbabwe, which is the supreme law of the land, does notexpressly provide for the realization of socio-economic rights such as labour rights.Labour and employment issues are only enshrined in various Acts of Parliament and aredivided into the public sector, private sector and export processing zones

The Labour Act is the principal legislation governing the general aspects of theemployment relationship in the private sector. Some aspects of the employmentrelationship are regulated by the National Social Security Act [Chapter 17:04], whichallows for the establishment of social security schemes for the provision of benefits foremployees and provide for the labour inspection framework.

The National Employment Councils (NECs)

For those who are not familiar with NECs, here is a short definition of who they are: the NECsare representative bodies of employer and employee organizations. The NEC is ordinarily made up of four structures namely: the Council, the Executive Committee,the Negotiating Committee and the Local Joint Committee. Key to these structures areDesignated Agents (DA) and Arbitrators who are responsible for resolving disputes interms of the Labour Act.

The NEC Constitution

1. The Council – A national structure composed of Councillors who meet once a
year at an Annual General Meeting. The council is the supreme policy and
decision-making organ.

2. Executive Committee – A national structure whose role is to implement Council
policies and receives monthly reports from NEC management.

3. Negotiating Committee – A national structure appointed by the Council to
conclude or amend the Collective Bargaining Agreement on behalf of the
Council. It deals with appeals from the Local Joint Committee.

4. Local Joint Committees – Regional structures appointed by the Council in any
area within its jurisdiction. They consist of equal number of representatives from
the employers’ organization and the trade union. One DA in each region is
responsible for conciliating disputes between employers.
Under Zimbabwean law, the industry agreement made by NEC is binding on all employers and employees in the industry, whether or not they are members.
Collective bargaining
Collective bargaining in most sectors  takes place at NEC level and, in a fewcases, at company level through functional Works Councils. The Negotiating Committeecarries out collective bargaining at NEC level and Works Councils at company level. Interms of the Labour Act, workers are entitled to negotiate at company levels for specificbenefits through Works Councils. However, nowadays, veryfew Works Councils are functional in the most sectors of the economy. In a country with a high unemployment rate, workers lack the desire nor inclination to engage an employer and in the past when interviewed have highlighted the problems of victimization and intimidation as the main causes of thenon-functionality of Workers’ Committees and Works Councils.

During the past 10 or so years, NECs were left to their own devices by their key stakeholders and as a result, their mode of operation developed  a life of its own. Instead of remaining at the centre at they must objectively represent both employers and employees equally, the NECs shifted to the left and took  posture where their role has been to argue and push for higher wages regardless of what the fundamentals are for the employers at business and organizational level. There are allegations that, the severe economic hardships of the last decade made them loose focus and as their own livelihoods depend on income from a percentage from the sector employees, they set aside their mandate for the self gain and profit motive.  Consequently, most sectoral NECs are now perceived by most employers to represent the interests of the employee organizations only.
Investigations done by the writer have revealed that where there is consensus and progress in wage determination where the employer negotiates directly with the Workers’ Council. This is because when the business is struggling, the employees on the ground, experience it on a daily basis with the employer and therefore during collective bargaining, they tend to be reasonable. There are many instances where employees have chosen to have nil increments over determined periods of time if the employer allows for natural attrition only whilst guaranteeing nil retrenchments.
Recent disagreements
In what was perceived to be a controversial move by 17 employer associations under the Employers Confederation of Zimbabwe (EMCOZ)  after a December 2010 meeting, employers agreed to make a once-off salary review in 2011 because of the tough operating environment. [ii]
However, this it was feared that this stance could fuel more job boycotts by employees. Collective bargaining ended in deadlock in many sectors in 2010 after unions in many sectors represented by their sector NECs pushed for salaries above the poverty datum line now estimated to be over US$500. The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) has been under the rebuttable presumption that many companies are paying “slave wages” and use the subdued economic activity as an excuse.
There have been numerous cases of litigation between employers and employees because of failed salary negotiations and this has been disruptive to business operations worsening the already challenging operating environment for most sectors of the economy. ZCTU has argued for wages relating to what they have referred to as “price and income ratio”, another phrase for wages based on “economic hardships”.  On the other hand employers watched helplessly as NECs bulldozed them into awarding unsustainable salaries during collective bargaining hence the deadlock.
As a result, labour relations in Zimbabwe have been rocked by endless salary disputes and retrenchments, as the economy has not been performing well owing to a decade- long economic stagnation and hyperinflation. The introduction of the multi-currency regime in during the first quarter of 2009 brought some long awaited relief to the economy but most companies operating within both the productive and retail sectors are still battling.
Figure A below summarizes how it has become a loosing battle for all stakeholders, including the very NECs who would have engineered the cycle leading to the “killing process of the goose that lays the golden egg.” 

The goose are the employees who if they loose their employment as a result of mechanization to minimize labour relations troubles, amongst other issues and retrenchments because employers cannot afford the higher wages the NECs are demanding, the NECs would have depleted the very catchment pool of employees that they rely on for their fee income.



Figure A -  NECs: Killing the Goose




Implications for decision making
At a 2010 British Council Management Express thought leadership seminar held in Harare, in August 2010, renowed economist and University of Zimbabwe’s Graduate School of Management academic Professor Tony Hawkins addressing delegates in a presentation entitled ‘The New Normal: Implications for business decision-making in Zimbabwe 2010’, identified six areas where Zimbabwe’s New Normal can best be understood as follows: market size; skills; finance and capital; foreign exchange; infrastructure (both hard and soft); and institutions.
What might be of major interest to delegates in this conference are the key observations made by Hawkins in relation to skills, wages and labour productivity. 
With specific regards to skills, Hawkins noted that Zimbabwe used to be “well-endowed with skills with a strong educational and training sector.” There has been a “severe brain-drain which has also adversely affected the education sector that no longer has the capacity to regenerate skills.” Today, skills shortages are becoming manifest in specialist areas such as “tobacco and horticulture production, surveying, geology  etc.” On the other hand, we have seen some sectors like the public services and municipal services sector having bloated workforce structures which are proving to be unsustainable.
With specific focus on wages and productivity, Hawkins argues that old model where “wage awards that were driven by what employees needed to survive on rather than their productivity” is not sustainable under the New Normal of dollarization. To buttress this point, Hawkins cited a new World Bank report  which estimates industrial wages for casual labour at $215 a month in Zimbabwe compared with $129 in Zambia and $67 in Malawi. Hawkins further contended that “where the exchange rate is fixed or externally determined” business costs and productivity must adjust accordingly underscoring the fact that “wages must be linked to productivity”. [iii]
The way forward for Zimbabwe
1.       Link remuneration to productivity
2.       Link wages and productivity to competitiveness
3.       Reconstitute the NECs and make them more accountable to key stakeholders
4.       Strengthen the Workers’ Councils through education and training
5.       Perhaps government is the missing link. Would a tripartite agreement between government, labour and industry.
ANNEXURE
Is Zimbabwe competitive?[iv]
Is Zimbabwe competitive? Are all facets of Zimbabwe’s economic sectors competitive? Are Zimbawe companies competitive? With the globalization of markets, the increased mobility of corporate assets, and the need for productive human resources, this question has become all the more complex to answer. It is important to answer this question so that we are able to tackle questions on certain fundamentals such as: financial performance and labor productivity.

We have to be interested in the degree to which firms operating in Zimbabwe have fundamentally different financial structures and performance compared to firms located elsewhere.
With respect to financial competitiveness we have to ask the following questions:
  • If one were to invest or operate in Zimbabwe, how would the firm’s asset structure likely vary compared to a firm operating in some other country in Africa or average location in the world?
  • In Zimbabwe, do firms typically hold more cash and other short term assets, or do they concentrate their assets in physical plant and equipment?
  • On the liability side, do firms operating in Zimbabwe have a higher percent of payables compared to other firms operating in Africa, or do they hold a higher concentration of long term debt?
  • The structure of the income statement is also telling.
  • Do firms operating in Zimbabwe have relatively higher costs of goods sold, operating costs, or income taxes compared to firms located elsewhere in the region or the world in general?
  • Are returns on equity higher in Zimbabwe?
  • Are profit margins greater?
  • Are inventories held longer?
In many instances, people make all the difference. In addition to financial competitiveness,  it is crucial to assess labour competitiveness by considering the extent to which labor deployment and productivity in Zimbabwe differs from regional and global benchmarks. In this case, we have to be interested in the amount of labor required to operate a typical business in Zimbabwe and the likely returns on this human investment. Questions to be asked include the following:
  • What is the typical ratio of short-term and long-term assets to employee?
  • What are typical capital-labor ratios?
  • How different are these ratios to those in Africa in general and the world as a whole?
  • What are the average sales and net profits per employee in Zimbabwe compared to regional benchmarks?
Again, these and over 50 other measures of labor productivity have to be considered with a view to assisting managers in gauging the competitive performance of Zimbabwe at the global level. With the globalization of markets, greater foreign competition, and the reduction of entry barriers, it becomes all the more important to benchmark Zimbabwe against other countries on a worldwide basis.
The exercise of generating international benchmarks and measuring gaps is not an obvious task. We first, need to aggregate across firms in Zimbabwe. Second, we need to control for exchange rate volatility by eliminating all currency effects and finally, comparable financial standards and comparable categories such as assets, liabilities, income and ratios by country, region and on a worldwide basis ought to be used.





Recognizing and Dealing with Passive Aggressive, High Pressure, Selling Tactics.

Last Friday the 25th February 2011, I stopped at a fuel station to get tyre pressure and fuel. A woman who was selling apples approached me and said she had no bus fare as she had not generated any sales the whole day because it was raining and there was continued harassment by the city police. I told her that I already had enough apples at home and therefore was not in the market for more and proceeded to engage with more street vendors who wanted to sell me windscreen wipers.
Hardly a minute later, the woman street vendor had packed six apples in a small plastic bag and through the open window of the drivers’ seat placed them on the dashboard. Louder this time, I told her again that I did not need any apples, but she replied that it was a “gift”. Why would a stranger give a passing motorist a gift, I thought to myself. I took the packet and tried to hand it back to her and she refused saying “to refuse to buy my apples is fine. I understand perfectly. However to also refuse my apples as a gift given in good faith, is an insult.” She further stated that she was not willing to take the apples back home so she would rather have someone take them home as a gift from her.  
We always need apples at home. In fact, I was planning to pass through the Spar in Eastlea to do a few groceries and buy fruit for the weekend.  However, I have never been one for buying food from the street for health reasons. Besides, I did not believe that these particular apples were of great quality.
I soon realized that when someone forces you to receive a gift like that, it is very difficult to refuse. It would have been much easier if I had been able to drive away quickly after placing the packet of apples in her hands, but I was stuck because the car was still being refueled. The back and forth from the dashboard into her hands was becoming awkward so I felt trapped and ended up accepting the unwanted gift.
After she succeeded in gently placing the apples on my dashboard and declared for the tenth time that it was a gift, she then walked away. As it was taking forever to fill up my car, she came back after five minutes and advised me to lock up my car as there were many people loitering around who could easily open the door, grab my bag from the car and run. She moved away from me again and disappeared from my sight.
Meanwhile, I started quizzing myself why I had accepted the apples from a needy person, eeking out a living from the street vending. All sorts of thoughts started going through my head. Why was I not firm enough; why did I not close my window and why did I not tell her that the quality of the apples is shoddy and so on. Why was I feeling guilty, I asked myself.  I had done nothing wrong but to receive apples I did not want from someone who had told me a sob story about not having sold anything that day because of the rain harassment from the city police was unacceptable.
I recognized this transaction for what it was, passive aggressive, high pressure selling tactic. However, as the guilt feeling was becoming unbearable and I had no desire to get re-engage with her in the noisy business of attempting to return the “gift”, I requested the fuel attendant to call her back. I asked her how much the apples were and paid her the USD 3 she wanted for the six apples. She accepted the money and walked away.
In essence, I had paid for a low quality product I did not want so that I could ease the guilt I was feeling. At the same time I found myself admiring this woman thinking how very smart she was. Here is a woman who in a non - threatening but firm manner had used a sympathetic story and chance to make a sale. Passive aggression, high pressure selling tactics and coercion to make a sale are all allowable and above board selling methods in business. I thought to myself that, with time on my side and under different circumstances, this street vendor is a woman I would have wanted to know and try to understand the logic she deploys to use this method of selling, how she identifies her buyers and so on.
It is very easy to make the assumption that she is needy or poor because she is a pedestrian and street vending a profession that has been criminalized by the city fathers. Annual market sales of street vendors in Harare alone is valued at over USD 150 million. The street vendor knew exactly what she was doing and she achieved her objective of making the sale. Passive aggressive, high pressure selling tactics which I have since termed “hassling marketing” is rife amongst street vendors throughout the world. They know you do not have the time, so they put pressure on you and you quickly and easily give up negotiating and buy.
Here is a five-point plan for recognizing and dealing with hassle marketers:
Trait One : They always tell you a sad and sob story – in this case, no sales for the day, no cash for transportation back home and harassment by the city police.
Solution One : Do not engage street vendors if you have no intention of transacting with them. They are sales focused and will play any trick to get you to part with your cash, no matter how you perceive it to be insignificant. This is their core business. They have sharpened their competencies over the years. They live this existence everyday and therefore your ability to outsmart them is lower that their ability to outsmart you.
Trait Two : They will not accept a “no” for an answer - in this case, after I refused her offer to sell to me, she then offered the apples as a “gift”.
Solution Two : When you engage them verbally, you are most likely to lose. Engaging you in conversation is a way of building a rapport, of bonding. You bond with a street vendor at the peril of your pocket. In most cultures on the African continent, it is impolite to refuse a “gift.” Whoever coined the phrase “there is no free lunch” knew that those who freely offer “gifts” to you always end up collecting far much more from you than the gift you received. In this case, I ended up with shoddy apples for more than better supermarket quality which I would have bought at a lesser price.
Trait Three : Do not feel sorry for street vendors or make assumptions that they are needy and poor – in this case, the mere fact that I was driving and they were a pedestrian does not make them needy and poor. Street vending is a legitimate business and any street vendor is a business person.
Solution Three : There is no basis for believing all their sad stories. These are marketing gimmicks, marketing postures to make a sale. Recognize that the whole bonding exercise, the chit chatting about nothing is meant for you to sometimes make you feel sorry for them. It’s a selling posture practiced and a competency sharpened over time.
Trait Four : Sometimes they play on your ego. They create the perception that you are better than them and therefore in a better position to help, by buying. In essence they are using passive aggression and high pressure selling tactics to bulldoze you into making the purchase. Their own egos are minimized and they maximize your own ego. They are determined and therefore will not let you leave before making the purchase.
Solution Four : The deeper you engage in conversation, the deeper you are falling and the likelihood that you will end up making the purchase. Manage your own ego and walk away. Recognize that this is not a popularity contest.
 Trait Five : Hassle marketers can be extremely nice and good natured. Remember how she came back to tell me that I needed to lock my car because of too many people loitering around, when in fact she was a loiterer herself. Demonstrating kindness and caring is part of the bigger agenda of making the sale. Hassle marketers are master psychologists.
Solution Five : Just do not fall for the kindness and niceness. Walk or drive away and refrain from further conversation. Do not worry that you are being rude. It is okay to be firm and assertive after all it is your hard earned money you are going to part with no matter how little it might seem. Engage with street vendors if you have the intention of buying.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

ESCAPADES OF A CORPORATE STRATEGIST

I would like to know why a snake bites what it does not eat.

Copyright March 7, 2009 By Gloria Ndoro 
The community I am currently living is beyond any form of description because any type of description can be too simplistic thereby limiting and minimizing who really these people are. For example, men are not allowed to mix with women under whatever circumstances. Yet today, the 7th March, 2009, I had lunch with a family of 6 men represented by 3 generations, the grandfather, his 4 sons and 1 grand child of about 5 years who was almost fluent English and was the translator of the day.
We sat on a large Persian rug on the floor of their shop in a circle. Afghan “pilaf” rice had been cooked and when I arrived, one of the younger sons was sent to buy, my favorite, Afghani bread. As soon as we the bread arrived, it was nicely laid in the middle and the grandfather, summoned another son to start dishing for everybody.

I was invited yesterday to come for lunch today at 12 noon and I was more than royally late pitching up at 1.15pm. They waited for me. I was embarrassed. They told me not to apologize. They were full of welcome and smiles, I mean really sincere smiles. The boy of 5 then told me that I was welcome as a guest in their quarters and therefore  must relax. The eldest son summoned me to sit after he had effortlessly sat on the floor. I followed suit clumsily sat down on the floor stretching my legs across the middle of the floor when I realized they all had their shoes off and sat in a position where they use the back of their feet as a stool. I attempted with difficulty to try to remove my boots and they politely told me not to. Secretly I was wishing I was as flexible and lean as them.

The grandfather has got three wives and the elder son has got one wife. None of the women were invited to the lunch. I enquired and was told that they were at home. I further inquired who had cooked the rice and was told it was one of the sons of about 19 years.

After, I finally settled myself in a position that was comfortable, I completely relaxed totally oblivious of where I was and that I was the only woman around. Suddenly, it dawned on me that, here I am, having a good time in the company of 6 male family members and looking to celebrating women’s day tomorrow yet there were no Afghani women family members in sight. What contradiction, I thought. How could I feel comfortable in a setting that seemed devoid of normalcy. What was this all about?

I decided not to choke on my delicious meal and started engaging my hosts in conversation.

The reality on the ground in Afghanistan is that, despite many years of concern about the situation of Afghan women, it is only most recently, within the last decade, after indescribable conditions of extreme tragedy, political violence including infrastructure destruction and general economic decline over a period spanning some 30 years, that the situation has propelled Afghanistan and the plight of its women and girls firmly back into the global spotlight. For the past 5 years or so, outside of the setting of the United Nations and of the international community, there is a groundswell of concern, from many internal and external stakeholders including Parliamentarians to First Ladies, from entertainers and media stars to non-governmental organizations, all calling for the full recognition of the rights of women and girls in Afghanistan.

Full recognition of the rights of women and girls is the easy part. What I know the international community is at a loss is how does a woman/girl, who has become aware of their rights execute these rights in an environment characterized by the following:

ü  the general movement of women, is restricted. That a family's social position depends on the public behavior of its female members is a guiding reality. Stepping outside prescribed roles and behavioral norms in public results in moral condemnation and social ostracism. It is the dictates of society that place a burden on both men and women to conform.

ü  Under such circumstances gender roles necessarily follow defined paths. Male prerogatives reside in family economic welfare, politics, and relationships with outsiders; within the family they are expected to be disciplinarians and providers for aged parents. Female roles stress motherhood, child socialization and family nurturing. Even among professional career women, family responsibilities remain a top priority. Thus women's self-perception of their roles, among the majority, urban and rural, contributes to the perpetuation of patriarchal values.

ü  30 years of war have destroyed the infrastructure of the educational system and further increased the illiteracy rate in Afghanistan. Only 5 per cent of women are able to read and write (during the 1980s, the female adult literacy rate was only 8 per cent).

ü  Only 23 per cent of the population has access to safe water, and only 12 per cent have access to adequate sanitation, thereby increasing the incidence of diseases. At least 15,000 Afghans die of tuberculosis every year, of which 64 per cent are women.

ü  Only about 15 per cent of births are attended by trained health workers, with more than 90 per cent of births take place at home. According to UNICEF, the maternal mortality rate in Afghanistan is the second highest in the world, with an estimated 15,000 women dying each year from pregnancy-related causes.

ü  The poor health situation has been aggravated by the lack of basic health services and resources, particularly in rural areas; the strict segregation of medical staff (male health workers are not allowed to touch or treat female workers) and the small number of trained women doctors, nurses and midwives that remained in the country after the rise of the Taliban.

ü  The infant mortality rate is 165 per 1,000; the under five mortality rate is 257 per 1,000, with one in four children in Afghanistan dying before the age of five from preventable diseases.

ü  In a nutshell, Afghan society is very consistent in its attitudes toward the underlying principles of gender. It is the application of these principles that varies from group to group; and there is a wide range of standards set for accepted female behavior, as well as differences in male attitudes toward correct treatment of women. Contradictions arise between traditional customary practices, many of which impinge on the rights of women and are alien to the spirit of Islam, the other functioning canon which emphasizes equality, justice, education and community service for both men and women. http://countrystudies.us/afghanistan/58.htm

ü  In addition, the dictates of Islam are themselves subject to diverse interpretation amongst reformists, Islamists and ultraconservatives. Debates between these groups can be extremely volatile. So it is the interpretation of the dictates of Islam not Islam itself that is the issue particularly where the marginalization of women is concerned.

ü  Most importantly, within the vast store of Afghan folktales covering religion, history and moral values, many reinforce the values governing male and female behavior. They illustrate what can or cannot be done, describe rewards and punishments, and define ideal personality types. Thus they serve to perpetuate the existing gender order and through example make it psychologically satisfying. http://countrystudies.us/afghanistan/58.htm

My lunch was a business lunch. I have been buying rugs from this family business ever since I landed in Afghanistan in January 2009. Buying Persian rugs is a chore, fun chore, liberating and surprising to one-self. When you think you have chosen what you believe are the best rugs, they unfold even better ones and you can easily start again and abandon the earlier process that could have taken you almost half a day. The other Friday (our weekends here are Friday and Saturday as we are an Islamic Republic), I spent half a day in the shop and left without buying anything out of confusion! I needed a break, a fresh start and to clear my head for another week.

So you can imagine, in a country where I have got very few friends and no family, all you do is work day in and day out. So shopping for Persian rugs, the real stuff, is something I look forward to. Its exciting for me. It’s a release. Its like looking forward to a rendezvous with a lover! I have spent hours in this family’s shop so we are like family (without the women present). Their service is unparalleled. They never tire. They will open the shop for you even after they had closed. They will extend the shopping hours for you. And of course, you will gladly leave your hard earned money there. So when there was an invitation for lunch, I could not miss it for anything.

So as we celebrate March 8th 2009, International Women’s Day, I would like to know, if we the international community’s efforts to end violence against women, to improve their economic participation and to ensure that there is peace with justice in their daily lives and they  access health, education and their human rights under the law is making a difference in a country where I know for sure that I am going to leave before I have even scratched the surface. I would like to know why a snake bites what it does not eat.